US DEFENSE GROUP
Sectors

Government Contracting

Federal contract spending reached $793 billion by GAO's FY2025 obligation count, while GovSpend's broader OT-inclusive view reached $833.8 billion; the difference between companies that win and companies that merely register is infrastructure.

FY2024 federal contract awards
Broad DIB suppliers
Annual SBIR/STTR
Small Biz Share

What these numbers mean: DoD budget, federal contract awards, contract obligations, and DIB supplier counts are separate measures.

Federal Contracting Is an $800 Billion Market. Most Registered Companies Never Win.

Federal contract awards reached $773.68 billion in FY2024 and continued growing in FY2025. GAO reported approximately $793 billion in FY2025 federal contract commitments, while GovSpend’s broader count, which includes Other Transaction awards, reached $833.83 billion (Source: Federal Contracting Year in Review FY2024, GovSpend, February 2025; A Snapshot of Government-Wide Contracting for FY2025, GAO, May 2026; FY25 Federal Spending and Contract Awards, GovSpend, February 2026). Over 674,000 entities are registered on SAM.gov (Source: SAM.gov by the Numbers, GSA, April 2024). Yet only 108,899 companies received contract awards in FY2024, and GovSpend reported that only 105,044 companies won federal work in FY2025 (Source: Federal Contracting Year in Review FY2024, GovSpend, February 2025; FY25 Federal Spending and Contract Awards, GovSpend, February 2026). The market is enormous, growing, and accessible in theory. In practice, a filtering mechanism separates the companies that win from the companies that simply participate. See USDG’s federal contracting guide for the difference between awards, obligations, and budgets.

The Market

Federal contracting is not a niche. It is the single largest addressable market in the world for business-to-government services and products. The Department of Defense alone accounted for approximately $464.2 billion of federal contract spending in FY2024, representing 59.87% of all federal contracting activity (Source: Federal Contracting Year in Review FY2024, GovSpend, February 2025).

The growth trajectory is significant. Federal contracting grew approximately 29% from $598 billion in FY2019 to $774 billion in FY2024 (Source: Federal Contracting Year in Review FY2024, GovSpend, February 2025). This is not cyclical expansion. It reflects a structural increase in government reliance on contracted services and products across defense, technology, infrastructure, and professional services.

Small businesses received a record $183.3 billion in FY2024, representing 28.78% of total awards (Source: SBA News Release 25-24, Small Business Administration, January 2025). The SBIR and STTR programs have been reauthorized through 2031, providing approximately $6.3 billion in annual non-dilutive funding for technology development (Source: Federal Contracting Year in Review FY2024, GovSpend, 2025; CRS Report R43695, Congressional Research Service, 2025). GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule alone facilitates 16,108 contractors generating $51.9 billion in sales during FY2024 (Source: GSA Federal Schedules Annual Report, Federal Schedules, 2024).

Executive Order 14275, “Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement,” raised the micro-purchase threshold to $15,000 and the simplified acquisition threshold to $350,000 (Source: Federal Procurement Reform Analysis, Berkeley Research Group, 2025). These changes expand the range of contracts that can be awarded through streamlined processes, creating additional entry points for companies with the right positioning.

At the same time, the landscape is shifting. Approximately 13,000 contracts valued at roughly $61 billion were terminated through government efficiency initiatives in 2025 (Source: Federal Contract Terminations Tracker, Washington Technology, December 2025). Contract terminations create disruption, but they also create opportunity: every terminated contract represents work that still needs to be performed, often by different companies with different capabilities and cost structures.

The Structural Challenge

The win rate for first-time bidders in federal contracting is approximately 3% (Source: GovCon Market Analysis, GovCon Giants, 2024). The average time to win a first federal contract is 12 to 24 months (Source: Federal Contracting Guide, USFCR, 2025). The total investment to reach that first contract, including registration, compliance, proposal development, and business development costs, ranges from $80,000 to $130,000 (Source: GovCon Market Analysis, GovCon Giants, 2024). These numbers describe a market that rewards persistence and preparation, but punishes companies that enter without infrastructure.

The challenge is not that companies lack strong products or capable teams. The challenge is that federal procurement operates under a set of rules, relationships, and institutional expectations that bear almost no resemblance to commercial sales. Past performance evaluations, cost accounting standards, contract types (FFP, T&M, CPFF), set-aside categories, teaming agreements, subcontracting plans, and compliance requirements create layers of complexity that function as a barrier to entry. Companies with fewer than 10 years of federal experience win approximately 20% of the contracts they pursue. Mature companies with established track records win between 50% and 75% (Source: Win Rate Analysis, Georgia Tech PTAC, 2024; Proposal Win Rate Benchmarks, Lohfeld Consulting, 2024).

Profit margins tell a similar story. Small business government contractors operate at average profit margins of approximately 8%, compared to 20% for mid-size contractors and 24% for large contractors (Source: Deltek Clarity Government Contracting Industry Study, Deltek, 2024). Scale creates operating leverage in government contracting more dramatically than in most commercial markets, because compliance and overhead costs are relatively fixed while revenue scales with contract volume.

The HUBZone program, designed to direct contracts to historically underutilized business zones, has never met its statutory 3% goal since the program’s inception (Source: HUBZone Program Performance, Small Business Administration, 2025). Set-aside programs create advantages, but realizing those advantages still requires the same capture infrastructure, compliance readiness, and proposal capabilities that any competitive contract demands.

What Separates Companies That Succeed

Companies that build sustainable federal revenue share a set of behaviors that distinguish them from the majority that register on SAM.gov and wait for something to happen. They invest in capture management before they invest in proposal writing. They build relationships with program offices and contracting officers before solicitations are released. They pursue teaming arrangements that combine their technical strengths with partners who bring past performance, clearances, and established contract vehicles.

Successful companies also understand the math of federal business development. They maintain a pipeline of qualified opportunities at a ratio that accounts for realistic win rates. They track procurement forecasts, pre-solicitation notices, and sources sought announcements as leading indicators, not just published RFPs. They treat their SAM.gov registrations, capability statements, and GSA schedules as living documents that require continuous maintenance.

The pattern is consistent across company size: the winners treat government contracting as a distinct business function with its own processes, metrics, and professional staff, not as a side project managed by whoever has availability. The companies that approach federal contracting with the same rigor they apply to their core business operations are the ones that cross the threshold from registration to revenue.

Where US Defense Group Operates

US Defense Group provides the strategic advisory and operational infrastructure that defense and dual-use technology companies need to compete effectively in federal procurement. The USDG platform brings together government contracting expertise, compliance readiness, and business development support in a single integrated capability.

GovSeek, the AI-powered government contracting intelligence platform built within the USDG ecosystem, gives companies the ability to discover relevant contract opportunities, identify teaming partners, analyze competitive landscapes, and build capture strategies grounded in real procurement data. GovSeek’s proposal workflow is designed to shorten the time between opportunity discovery and a review-ready draft, enabling companies to pursue more qualified opportunities with greater precision. Actual response timelines and win rates depend on the solicitation, company profile, past performance, and human review process.

Launcher Station, the accelerator operated within the USDG platform, is specifically designed to help technology companies pursue federal contract revenue with less upfront advisory cost. Launcher Station provides the operational scaffolding that first-time contractors typically lack: capture management, proposal support, compliance infrastructure, and access to a network of teaming partners and mentors who have built successful federal businesses. For companies considering whether to invest the $80,000 to $130,000 required to enter the market, Launcher Station provides a structured path that reduces the risk and compresses the timeline.

The Decision in Front of You

The federal contracting market grew 29% over five years and shows no structural signs of contraction. Small business awards hit a record $183.3 billion in FY2024. The SBIR/STTR programs provide $6.3 billion annually in non-dilutive funding. The opportunity is not theoretical.

What most companies lack is not ambition or capability. It is the infrastructure to translate those qualities into federal revenue. The companies that build that infrastructure now will hold compounding advantages that late entrants cannot replicate.

Sources

Ready to discuss your business?

Schedule a Conversation →